<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/</link>
	<description>Still powered by a contradiction in terms</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronaldo</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronaldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>I see you point, and I believe it may well be true. But I can't help but think that Jordan doesn't know where he is going. It's much like the Matrix movies. The interest generated by the first one was so big that anything the writers could come up with later wouldn't be as satisfying as the magic shown before. But they went and did the movies anyway because the money was there to be earned.

Anyway, as you said, stories tend to grow big. But as Jim MacDonald said, any word that doesn't support plot or doesn't advance the theme or doesn't reveal character should be left out of the story. It's a hard thing to do (and I know it, being an aspiring writer myself -- in Portuguese, my native language, of course) but Jordan seems to have forgotten this a long way back in the series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you point, and I believe it may well be true. But I can&#8217;t help but think that Jordan doesn&#8217;t know where he is going. It&#8217;s much like the Matrix movies. The interest generated by the first one was so big that anything the writers could come up with later wouldn&#8217;t be as satisfying as the magic shown before. But they went and did the movies anyway because the money was there to be earned.</p>
<p>Anyway, as you said, stories tend to grow big. But as Jim MacDonald said, any word that doesn&#8217;t support plot or doesn&#8217;t advance the theme or doesn&#8217;t reveal character should be left out of the story. It&#8217;s a hard thing to do (and I know it, being an aspiring writer myself &#8212; in Portuguese, my native language, of course) but Jordan seems to have forgotten this a long way back in the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Limon</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Limon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I frequently find myself in two minds over The Wheel of Time - Jordan's writing gets more detailed as the series goes on, his charaterisation gets richer, the books are more of a joy to read, but on the other hand less and less happens. I don't think the later WOT books are necessarily worse, it's just that they are in a very different style to the early books. I think that's the problem, Jordan started writing one thing, then switched to writing another mid-series.

As an aspiring fantasy writer, I'm in the middle of writing my first proper fantasy novel. It's turning out to be a lot longer than I originally intended, and I'm wondering whether I would be best served by ploughing on and committing to a trilogy, or re-writing what I have already written and "strip it down to the bone" to get it into a single volume. Some single volume fantasy is very good - The Barbed Coil by JV Jones springs to mind, but there is always the risk that it will seem sketchy and rushed - The Redemption of Athelus by Leigh and David Eddings is a pattern I wouldn't want to repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frequently find myself in two minds over The Wheel of Time - Jordan&#8217;s writing gets more detailed as the series goes on, his charaterisation gets richer, the books are more of a joy to read, but on the other hand less and less happens. I don&#8217;t think the later WOT books are necessarily worse, it&#8217;s just that they are in a very different style to the early books. I think that&#8217;s the problem, Jordan started writing one thing, then switched to writing another mid-series.</p>
<p>As an aspiring fantasy writer, I&#8217;m in the middle of writing my first proper fantasy novel. It&#8217;s turning out to be a lot longer than I originally intended, and I&#8217;m wondering whether I would be best served by ploughing on and committing to a trilogy, or re-writing what I have already written and &#8220;strip it down to the bone&#8221; to get it into a single volume. Some single volume fantasy is very good - The Barbed Coil by JV Jones springs to mind, but there is always the risk that it will seem sketchy and rushed - The Redemption of Athelus by Leigh and David Eddings is a pattern I wouldn&#8217;t want to repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>I am currently reading the WOT series (on book 5) and I am wondering where to jump off. I guess you really appreciate series like LOR and Foundation (original trilogy) as there is no wasted words, concise with each book holding together. I also liked the Vorkosigan series as  Lois Mcmaster Bujold treats each book as a separate story even after 10 or so books the series really holds together. When I think she had felt that the series had come to a natural end she simply moved on to another theme. Surely Robert Jordan is qualified to do the same. Thanks for the essay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently reading the WOT series (on book 5) and I am wondering where to jump off. I guess you really appreciate series like LOR and Foundation (original trilogy) as there is no wasted words, concise with each book holding together. I also liked the Vorkosigan series as  Lois Mcmaster Bujold treats each book as a separate story even after 10 or so books the series really holds together. When I think she had felt that the series had come to a natural end she simply moved on to another theme. Surely Robert Jordan is qualified to do the same. Thanks for the essay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annika</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Annika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly.  I am tired of waiting for long series to end before I can find out the big picture, which is usually anticlimatic anyways.  I also dislike books that have too many story plots going along at one time.  And I am probably the only person in the world who didn't like Lord of the Rings, books and movies.  Both were boring and utterly too complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly.  I am tired of waiting for long series to end before I can find out the big picture, which is usually anticlimatic anyways.  I also dislike books that have too many story plots going along at one time.  And I am probably the only person in the world who didn&#8217;t like Lord of the Rings, books and movies.  Both were boring and utterly too complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>I really like Stephen Donaldson's stuff.  I know what you mean about the series.  I am really leery any more with any series that seems too long, don't usually trust 'em any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like Stephen Donaldson&#8217;s stuff.  I know what you mean about the series.  I am really leery any more with any series that seems too long, don&#8217;t usually trust &#8216;em any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartly agree on your assesement of the wheel of time series. I gave up on book 6. My opinion of good series is that as long as the quality of the series is high the series doesn't have to end.I think Martin's Song of Ice and Fire is probably the best fantasy series in print. I also highly recommend Erikson's Malazan empire series as well for intelligent fantasy of a really epic scale. Here is a list of fantasy authors who write either single-volume fantasies or just trilogies:
1. ROBIN HOBB
2. MARK ANTHONY
3. DAVID GEMMELL
4. JAMES CLEMENS
5. DAVID COE
6. DEBORAH CHESTER
7. RL SALVATORE
8. JOHN MARCO
9. JV JONES
10.ANGUS WELLS
11. PAULA VOLSKY
12. MARTHA WELLS
13. TAD WILLIAMS
14. SARA DOUGLASS
15. MODESITT
16. MICHAEL STACKPOLE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartly agree on your assesement of the wheel of time series. I gave up on book 6. My opinion of good series is that as long as the quality of the series is high the series doesn&#8217;t have to end.I think Martin&#8217;s Song of Ice and Fire is probably the best fantasy series in print. I also highly recommend Erikson&#8217;s Malazan empire series as well for intelligent fantasy of a really epic scale. Here is a list of fantasy authors who write either single-volume fantasies or just trilogies:<br />
1. ROBIN HOBB<br />
2. MARK ANTHONY<br />
3. DAVID GEMMELL<br />
4. JAMES CLEMENS<br />
5. DAVID COE<br />
6. DEBORAH CHESTER<br />
7. RL SALVATORE<br />
8. JOHN MARCO<br />
9. JV JONES<br />
10.ANGUS WELLS<br />
11. PAULA VOLSKY<br />
12. MARTHA WELLS<br />
13. TAD WILLIAMS<br />
14. SARA DOUGLASS<br />
15. MODESITT<br />
16. MICHAEL STACKPOLE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.R. Yngve</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>A.R. Yngve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>The subject inspired to me to write this MAD-style poem:

See the hack writer. 
Hack, hack, hack. 
See him write a new book. 
Type, type, type. 
He writes one book a month. 
He makes enough money to live 
as long as he can write a book per month. 
On his table is his medicine 
to help him write faster. 
It is called "alcohol." 
Glug, glug, glug. 
The hack writer has to take his medicine 
twenty times a day! 
So what is his new book about? 
Same as the book he wrote before. 
It's about a boy who must save the world 
by finding a lost magic sword 
which is hidden inside a castle 
which can only be reached through a magic portal 
which has been split into six magic shards 
which must be taken from six evil wizards 
whose castles are guarded by dragons 
who can only be slain with a magic wand 
which is hidden in a cave 
which is guarded by trolls... but you get the idea. 
The hack writer has a problem with his "trilogy." 
It was supposed to be three books. 
But now it has grown to seven books in a series 
and he can't stop writing new ones. 
What are the two words 
that fantasy writers 
and fantasy fans 
hate the most? 
"The" and "End."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The subject inspired to me to write this MAD-style poem:</p>
<p>See the hack writer.<br />
Hack, hack, hack.<br />
See him write a new book.<br />
Type, type, type.<br />
He writes one book a month.<br />
He makes enough money to live<br />
as long as he can write a book per month.<br />
On his table is his medicine<br />
to help him write faster.<br />
It is called &#8220;alcohol.&#8221;<br />
Glug, glug, glug.<br />
The hack writer has to take his medicine<br />
twenty times a day!<br />
So what is his new book about?<br />
Same as the book he wrote before.<br />
It&#8217;s about a boy who must save the world<br />
by finding a lost magic sword<br />
which is hidden inside a castle<br />
which can only be reached through a magic portal<br />
which has been split into six magic shards<br />
which must be taken from six evil wizards<br />
whose castles are guarded by dragons<br />
who can only be slain with a magic wand<br />
which is hidden in a cave<br />
which is guarded by trolls&#8230; but you get the idea.<br />
The hack writer has a problem with his &#8220;trilogy.&#8221;<br />
It was supposed to be three books.<br />
But now it has grown to seven books in a series<br />
and he can&#8217;t stop writing new ones.<br />
What are the two words<br />
that fantasy writers<br />
and fantasy fans<br />
hate the most?<br />
&#8220;The&#8221; and &#8220;End.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFSignal</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>SFSignal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Book Series&lt;/strong&gt;

This rant on SF/F Book series got me thinking, which in and of itself is a formidable feat. I have mixed feelings about book series and wanted to hear what others have to say......
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Book Series</strong></p>
<p>This rant on SF/F Book series got me thinking, which in and of itself is a formidable feat. I have mixed feelings about book series and wanted to hear what others have to say&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronaldo</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronaldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 02:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>I never read anything by Eddings, but I always heard good things about those series before. If they're finished, I might very well consider them for my next book purchases. Thanks for the suggestions. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never read anything by Eddings, but I always heard good things about those series before. If they&#8217;re finished, I might very well consider them for my next book purchases. Thanks for the suggestions. <img src='http://log.reflectivesurface.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jedidja</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Jedidja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 12:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/05/24/book-series/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your Wheel of Time synopsis; I myself stopped in a similar vein. 'Sword of Truth' was a refreshing change :)

Have you tried David &#38; Leigh Eddings? The Belgariad, the Mallorean, and the three accompanying novels are a truly great series (that has completely finished, unfortunately). The first two (Belgariad and Mallorean) are sets of five books each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your Wheel of Time synopsis; I myself stopped in a similar vein. &#8216;Sword of Truth&#8217; was a refreshing change <img src='http://log.reflectivesurface.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Have you tried David &amp; Leigh Eddings? The Belgariad, the Mallorean, and the three accompanying novels are a truly great series (that has completely finished, unfortunately). The first two (Belgariad and Mallorean) are sets of five books each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
