<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Programming, aesthetics, and religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/</link>
	<description>Still powered by a contradiction in terms</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Interesting that i really like python, but not because i think it's similar to other languages that i like, but the oposite.

I programed in VB, C and now code in Bash, perl and mainly php.

But that's the "professional" list, at personal projects, I use Bash and python only.

On the other hand, as much as i like the language, python lacks a nice IDE and nice reference documentation (or it's aimed for the uninitiated or aimed to the language developer). Php's docs really beat python</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that i really like python, but not because i think it&#8217;s similar to other languages that i like, but the oposite.</p>
<p>I programed in VB, C and now code in Bash, perl and mainly php.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s the &#8220;professional&#8221; list, at personal projects, I use Bash and python only.</p>
<p>On the other hand, as much as i like the language, python lacks a nice IDE and nice reference documentation (or it&#8217;s aimed for the uninitiated or aimed to the language developer). Php&#8217;s docs really beat python</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Interesting that i really like python, but not because i think it's similar to other languages that i like, but the oposite.

I programed in VB, C and now code in Bash, perl and mainly php.

But that's the "professional" list, at personal projects, I use Bash and python only.

On the other hand, as much as i like the language, python lacks a nice IDE and nice reference documentation (or it's aimed for the uninitiated or aimed to the language developer)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that i really like python, but not because i think it&#8217;s similar to other languages that i like, but the oposite.</p>
<p>I programed in VB, C and now code in Bash, perl and mainly php.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s the &#8220;professional&#8221; list, at personal projects, I use Bash and python only.</p>
<p>On the other hand, as much as i like the language, python lacks a nice IDE and nice reference documentation (or it&#8217;s aimed for the uninitiated or aimed to the language developer)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loud Thinking</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Loud Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ruby on Rails swings by Brazil&lt;/strong&gt;

Despite being an aesthetic who "...hate underscore characters", Ronaldo M. Ferraz has managed to fall in love Ruby on Rails:...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ruby on Rails swings by Brazil</strong></p>
<p>Despite being an aesthetic who &#8220;&#8230;hate underscore characters&#8221;, Ronaldo M. Ferraz has managed to fall in love Ruby on Rails:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loud Thinking</title>
		<link>http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Loud Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.reflectivesurface.com/2004/09/01/programming-aesthetics-and-religion/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ruby on Rails swings by Brazil&lt;/strong&gt;

Despite being an aesthetic who "...hate underscore characters", Ronaldo M. Ferraz has managed to fall in love Ruby on Rails:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ruby on Rails swings by Brazil</strong></p>
<p>Despite being an aesthetic who &#8220;&#8230;hate underscore characters&#8221;, Ronaldo M. Ferraz has managed to fall in love Ruby on Rails:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
